The LUXE case study outlines the organisational context and issues faced with its selection and assessment (S&A). As an S&A consultant, advise the organisation/HR personnel on LUXE's steps should take to meet its S&A goals.

Introduction

LUXE, a distinguished online luxury clothing and homeware brand, is acclaimed for its unconventional designs and inventive marketing strategies. With offices in the UK and internationally, the company excels in delivering premium, bespoke services to its clientele. Although successful in attracting a diverse pool of applicants, LUXE contends with challenges in workforce diversity, particularly the representation of older employees. In response, the company seeks to refine its selection and assessment (S&A) processes for its forthcoming recruitment campaigns, targeting the hiring of six new candidates for Branding and Marketing Management (BMM) and Client Service Management (CSM) roles.

To this end, this paper will pursue two objectives: (1) to supply evidence-based recommendations for LUXE’s S&A process informed by relevant theoretical and empirical literature and (2) to promote fairness and diversity within the talent acquisition processes.

Frameworks

Evaluating and selecting candidates can be an intricate undertaking which requires a strategic plan to produce optimal results (Levenson et al., 2006). The competency-based strategy is one such method that emphasises the identification and evaluation of crucial skills, knowledge, and behaviour required for specific roles (Spencer & Spencer, 1993). However, it is critical to note that while this approach is robust, it may overlook other important factors, such as an applicant’s adaptability or growth potential (Campion et al., 2011).

A unique blend of this strategy with other methods could yield optimum results for a brand such as LUXE. This might include defining core competencies for the BMM and CSM roles, such as collaborative skills, receptiveness to innovative ideas, excellent interpersonal skills, and proficiency in managing challenging clients, combined with an assessment of their potential to grow and adapt to changes in the dynamic luxury market (Silzer & Church, 2009). These competencies can be measured using various tools such as (1) structured interviews (i.e., planned, standardised questions for every applicant), (2) work samples (i.e., tasks emulating actual job tasks), and (3) psychometric tests (i.e., assessments to measure cognitive capabilities and behaviour), reinforced by empirical studies supporting their effectiveness (Huffcutt & Arthur, 1994).

Another potentially beneficial approach is the Person-Environment Fit (P-E Fit) method. This method emphasises the implied correlation between an individual’s traits and the company’s culture and values (Kristof-Brown et al., 2005). It suggests that a higher level of fit results in superior job satisfaction, commitment, and performance. In the case of LUXE, this could mean evaluating an applicant’s compatibility with the company’s ethos of creativity, innovation, and premium service, possibly through culture-fit interviews, personality assessments, or situational judgment tests. However, there is a risk that striving exclusively for high P-E Fit may result in a homogeneous workforce, potentially stifling creativity and innovation, contrary to LUXE’s ethos (Rivera, 2012).

Incorporating the multiple-hurdle approach could further strengthen LUXE’s selection procedure. This method employs a series of assessments of ‘hurdles’, each of which needs to be cleared before advancing to the next (Hatch & Dyer, 2004). However, it is vital to ensure this process does not inadvertently disadvantage certain groups, and regular reviews should be conducted to ensure this. For LUXE, this could entail a structured sequence of evaluations, such as initial scrutiny of applications, competency-based assessments, and a P-E Fit assessment.

An amalgamation of these strategies could support LUXE in identifying and selecting the most suitable applicants for the BMM and CSM roles while simultaneously promoting its organisational objective to bolster workforce diversity (Nishii, 2013). Moreover, by deploying fair and impartial assessment techniques, LUXE can ensure equal opportunities for applicants to display their abilities, irrespective of age or other demographic factors (Ployhart & Holtz, 2008). If P-E Fit were prioritised, LUXE could recruit and retain individuals with the requisite skills and competencies to resonate with the company’s values and culture (Cable & DeRue, 2002). However, it is essential to consider the ethical implications of each process to ensure fairness and mitigate unconscious bias (Ryan & Ployhart, 2000).

Evaluation

Relatedly, various evaluation techniques can be leveraged within the conceptual framework of selection and assessment to determine the most suitable applicant for a given role. Drawing on empirical research from organisational psychology, one prominent strategy for such assessment is the implementation of structured interviews (Levashina et al., 2014). These interviews consist of a predetermined set of inquiries posed to each applicant, facilitating an equitable comparison based on their respective answers (Conway et al., 1995). This approach, grounded in the theory of objective assessment, is especially valuable in evaluating an applicant’s interpersonal capabilities, such as collaboration and managing demanding clients, crucial traits for the BMM and CSM role (Oh et al., 2011).

Cognitive ability tests are another effective assessment tool supported by cognitive psychology (Kuncel et al., 2004). These tests evaluate a candidate’s problem-solving ability, logical reasoning, and aptitude for learning, all vital for excelling professionally. The applicability of these cognitive abilities to job performance has been substantiated in various meta-analyses (McCrae & Costa, 1987). For LUXE, a cognitive ability test could be instrumental in discovering applicants with the intellectual proficiency to generate innovative marketing strategies or navigate intricate client situations.

Alternatively, personality evaluations embedded in trait theory (i.e., the psychological perspective that inherent personality traits greatly influence workplace behaviour and performance) could indicate an applicant’s unique characteristics and potential reactions in distinct situations (Whetzel & McDaniel, 2009). These evaluations might support LUXE in identifying applicants who are receptive to innovative ideas and exhibit a goal-orientated work ethic, both desirable traits for LUXE’s roles.

Situational judgement tests could also be utilised, and their effectiveness has been supported by extensive research (Salgado et al., 2003). This strategy can be useful in evaluating an applicant’s competence in managing challenging clients, a critical requirement for the CSM role. LUXE can gain insight into their judgement and decision-making skills by presenting applicants with various job-related circumstances and potential reactions

Lastly, work sample tests, which align with the principle of behavioural consistency (i.e., the concept that past behaviour is often an appropriate predictor of future behaviour), would require an applicant to perform a task, or tasks, that mirror the role they aspire to (Roth et al., 2005). This may offer a practical insight into an applicant’s potential performance. For instance, applicants for the BMM role could be tasked with creating a minor marketing campaign, while those for the CSM role may be asked to resolve a simulated client problem. This would demonstrate their competencies practically, further supporting LUXE in making informed decisions.

A composite of these evaluation methods, tailored to each role's requirements, can increase the likelihood of precise and comprehensive insights into an applicant’s aptitude while ensuring an equitable and unbiased selection procedure.

Competencies

Recognising the fundamental competencies of LUXE for the BMM and CSM roles not only streamlines the recruitment process but also empowers the company to attract individuals equipped for excellence in their roles (Armstrong & Taylor, 2023, “Organisation Development”).

For the BMM role, collaboration and receptiveness to innovative concepts are highly probable to be crucial competencies. This conclusion is drawn from a study of LUXE's emphasis on distinctive designs and inventive marketing strategies, often the product of cooperative efforts (Paunova, 2015). These collaborations have resulted in bold ideas and successful campaigns, a novel finding that underscores the importance of collaboration in the BMM role (Lee et al., 2012). Applicants should be able to provide evidence of their ability to work effectively with others, communicate clearly, and foster a positive team atmosphere.

Similarly, the premium clothing and homeware industry requires constant innovation to maintain a competitive edge (Tidd & Bessant, 2020). This observation is based on an analysis of industry trends and the strategies of successful competitors (Presbitero et al., 2016). Candidates eager to adopt new ideas and think unconventionally are likely to be more successful in propelling the brand’s ongoing success (Martín-Rojas et al., 2013).

Interpersonal skills and the capacity to manage thorough clients are critical competencies for the CSM role. CSM personnel must establish robust relationships with such clients to ensure satisfaction and loyalty, and applicants must demonstrate outstanding interpersonal abilities, such as active listening, empathy, and articulate communication (de Chernatony & Segal-Horn, 2003).

Furthermore, the luxury sector often attracts fastidious clients with stringent expectations. Therefore, CSM personnel should also possess patience, adaptability, and problem-solving skills. Demonstrating these skills can contribute to client retention and foster a positive brand image, a critical factor identified through a review of brand reputation studies in the luxury sector (Turner & Lee-Kelley, 2013).

Cognitive ability and result-oriented competencies are required for both the BMM and CSM roles. These competencies, supported by scholarly research, are understood as essential for processing intricate information, formulating informed choices, and devising inventive strategies (Miron-Spektor et al., 2018). This intellectual aptitude contributes to the brand’s expansion and the individual’s career growth (Presbitero et al., 2016).

A result-oriented mindset is also essential for successful performance in both roles. Applicants must demonstrate their ability to establish clear goals, prioritise tasks, and work effectively to meet deadlines (Turner & Lee-Kelley, 2013). This emphasis on outcomes, supported by performance data from successful individuals in similar roles, can ensure that LUXE remains successful in the competitive luxury sector (Armstrong & Taylor, 2023, “HR Analytics”).

By accentuating the importance of these competencies, LUXE can cultivate a diverse and high-performing workforce that aligns with its organisational objectives. This insight, which contributes to the existing body of knowledge on workforce development in the luxury sector, underscores the value of a strategic approach to competency identification and recruitment (Armstrong & Taylor, 2023, “Recruitment and Selection”).

Recommendations

To effectively identify the best applicants for LUXE’s BMM and CSM roles, it is suggested that LUXE adopt a comprehensive, multi-stage selection procedure. This strategy, supported by a study by Kehoe & Wright (2013), will enable LUXE to thoroughly evaluate applicants based on their skills, cognitive capabilities, and personal attributes.

The initial phase should include a meticulous application examination, followed by a pre-screening process. This aligns with the best practices suggested by Highhouse (2008) and will help LUXE identify applicants with the fundamental qualifications for each role, thereby streamlining the selection procedure.

Subsequently, an introductory evaluation stage should be carried out, comprising cognitive ability tests to gauge candidates’ problem-solving and critical thinking aptitudes and personality assessments to substantiate compatibility with the desired qualifications for each position (Schmitt & Chan, 1998). This approach is based on the findings of Lievens & Patterson (2011), which found that cognitive and personality assessments can significantly improve the quality of hires.

Situational judgement tests or work sample tests should be integrated into the selection process to assess applicants’ role-specific competencies. These evaluations can offer a practical view of job responsibilities and hindrances, enabling LUXE to examine applicants’ capacity to perform in real-world situations (Van Vugt et al., 2008). Once all data has been gathered and analysed, the selection panel can make an evidence-based decision regarding the final candidates for each role.

Following the emergence of research on the impact of unconscious bias in recruitment (Bielby, 2000), LUXE should employ anonymous recruitment methods to reduce unconscious biases. This can be accompanied by anonymising applicant information during the application review and initial assessment phases (Riach & Rich, 2002). Moreover, diverse selection panels should encourage a more inclusive decision-making process and minimise potential biases.

Finally, LUXE should develop transparent equal opportunity policies and guidelines to guarantee all applicants are treated equitably and given consideration during the selection process. By adhering to these principles and incorporating the suggested multi-stage selection approach, LUXE could be better prepared to recognise applicants with the necessary skills, cognitive capabilities, and attributes to excel while fostering a more diverse and inclusive workforce (Bohnet et al., 2016).

Challenges

Remedying potential obstacles in LUXE’s selection process will involve examining several crucial factors. These include (1) working towards a balance between efficiency and effectiveness, (2) guaranteeing the accuracy and consistency of evaluation, and (3) complying with legal and ethical guidelines.

In terms of harmonising efficiency and effectiveness, it is vital to establish a selection procedure that accurately identifies ideal applicants and does so quickly and with minimal resource expenditure (Highhouse, 2008). This balance can be achieved by utilising a staged strategy that integrates various evaluation techniques (Kuncel et al., 2013).  For example, initial screening through application forms or CVs, followed by online assessments, interviews, and simulation-based activities. According to recent research conducted by Chapman et al. (2005), this method can reduce the time for selection while still ensuring an expansive evaluation of applicants. Moreover, to mitigate candidate fatigue, LUXE could potentially consolidate various stages of the selection process by integrating assessments that measure multiple traits simultaneously (Armstrong & Taylor, 2023).

Safeguarding the accuracy and consistency of evaluations is another critical aspect.  LUXE should use assessment tools known to reliably predict job performance, as validated by numerous studies (Lievens & Sackett, 2012). LUXE could train those involved in the selection process to ensure the evaluation criteria are applied uniformly and fairly. Furthermore, LUXE should incorporate multiple evaluation methods, such as cognitive ability exams, personality evaluations, and situational judgment tests. This approach can alleviate potential biases and limitations linked to a single evaluation method, as demonstrated in a study by Hausknecht et al. (2004).

Legal and ethical considerations are also significant factors in the selection process (Gatewood et al., 2016). LUXE must ensure its selection procedures comply with laws such as the Equality Act 2010, which prohibits discrimination based on protected characteristics. This will involve constructing unbiased assessment tools and processes that do not disadvantage any applicant. Moreover, LUXE should maintain transparency about its selection criteria and offer feedback to candidates, fostering an objective and ethical selection process. Relatedly, promoting diversity in the workplace, according to Herring (2009), can boost creativity, innovation, and, ultimately, the company’s overall performance.

Addressing potential obstacles in LUXE’s selection process requires a strategic and comprehensive approach. By focusing on a balance between efficiency and effectiveness, guaranteeing the accuracy and consistency of evaluations, and complying with legal and ethical guidelines, LUXE can optimise its selection process to recruit the best applicants (Breaugh, 2008).

Conclusion

The suggested selection and assessment techniques for LUXE include diverse methods. Each is customised to the specific needs of the BMM and CSM roles.  This claim is supported by extensive research indicating the effectiveness of role-specific recruitment tactics (Breaugh, 2008). For the BMM role, integrating personality tests and collaborative exercises during the recruitment stage could be advantageous. This approach would aid in identifying applicants with potent teamwork capabilities and creative mindsets, proven prerequisites for success in such roles (Barrick et al., 2001).

For the CSM role, a fusion of situational judgement assessment and structured interviews could prove effective in appraising applicants’ people skills and proficiency in handling challenging client interactions.  This method aligns with the findings of recent studies on successful CSM recruitment (McDaniel et al., 2007).  Additionally, cognitive aptitude tests and goal-focused evaluations should be implemented for both roles to verify that applicants possess the required intellectual skills and motivation to succeed in their respective roles.  This aligns with Schmidt and Hunter’s (1998) argument on the correlation between cognitive aptitude and job performance.

Maintaining an equitable and diverse hiring process is paramount for LUXE, not just for legal compliance but also to uplift the company’s image and foster a more inclusive work environment. To realise this, LUXE must ensure the appraisal tools used are dependable and neutral, providing equal opportunities to all applicants. As argued by (Ployhart et al., 2002), neutral assessment tools can help ensure a fair recruitment process. LUXE might also consider introducing diversity education for HR personnel involved in the hiring process and monitor demographic information to detect any potential imbalances that could surface during selection (Roberson, 2006).

It will be vital for LUXE to review and refine its selection and assessment methods. This could involve routinely analysing the efficacy of the strategies, soliciting feedback from both successful and unsuccessful candidates, and keeping updated with the most recent studies and best practices in talent acquisition (Armstrong & Taylor, 2023, “Talent Management”). By taking these steps, LUXE can ensure its talent acquisition process remains current, fair, and aligned with the company’s objectives and values, supporting LUXE’s long-term prosperity and expansion. This conclusion, therefore, not only summarises key findings but also provides a proposal for future improvements in LUXE’s recruitment process.

References

  • Armstrong, M., & Taylor, S. (2023). HR analytics. In Armstrong’s Handbook of Human Resource Management Practice: A Guide to the Theory and Practice of People Management (16th ed., pp. 113-118). Kogan Page.
  • Armstrong, M., & Taylor, S. (2023). Organisation development. In Armstrong’s Handbook of Human Resource Management Practice: A Guide to the Theory and Practice of People Management (16th ed., pp. 179-209). Kogan Page.
  • Armstrong, M., & Taylor, S. (2023). Recruitment and selection. In Armstrong’s Handbook of Human Resource Management Practice: A Guide to the Theory and Practice of People Management (16th ed., pp. 245-264). Kogan Page.
  • Armstrong, M., & Taylor, S. (2023). Talent management. In Armstrong’s Handbook of Human Resource Management Practice: A Guide to the Theory and Practice of People Management (16th ed., pp. 265-274). Kogan Page.
  • Barrick, M.R., Mount, M.K., & Judge, T.A. (2001). Personality and performance at the beginning of the new millennium: What do we know and where do we go next? International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9(1-2), 9-30. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2389.00160
  • Bielby, W.T. (2000). Minimising workplace gender and racial bias. Contemporary Sociology, 29(1), 120-129. https://doi.org/10.2307/2654937
  • Bohnet, I., Geen, A., & Bazerman, M. H. (2016). When performance trumps gender bias: Joint versus separate evaluation. Management Science, 62(5), 1225-1234. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2015.2186
  • Breaugh, J.A. (2008). Employee recruitment: Current knowledge and important areas for future research. Human Resource Management Review, 18(3), 103-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2008.07.003
  • Cable, D.M., & DeRue, D.S. (2002). The convergent and discriminant validity of subjective fit perceptions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(5), 875-884. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.5.875
  • Campion, M.A., Fink, A.A., Ruggeberg, B.J., Carr, L., Phillips, G.M., & Odman, R.B. (2011). Doing competencies well: Best practices in competency modelling. Personnel Psychology, 64(1), 225-262. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2010.01207.x
  • Chapman, D.S., Uggerslev, K.L., Carroll, S.A., Piasentin, K.A., & Jones, D.A. (2005). Applicant attraction to organisations and job choice: A meta-analytic review of the correlates of recruiting outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(5), 928-944. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.5.928
  • Conway, J.M., Jako, R.A., & Goodman, D.F. (1995). A meta-analysis of interrater and internal consistency reliability of selection interviews. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80(5), 565-579. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.80.5.565
  • de Chernatony, L., & Segal-Horn, S. (2003). The criteria for successful services brands. European Journal of Marketing, 37(7/8), 1095-1118. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560310477681
  • Equality Act 2010. (2010). c. 15. Retrieved from https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2010/15/contents
  • Gatewood, R.D., Felid, H.S., & Barrick, M.R. (2016). Legal issues in selection. In Human Resource Selection (8th ed., pp 105-150). Cengage Learning.
  • Hatch, N.W., & Dyer, J.H. (2004). Human capital and learning as a source of sustainable competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 25(12), 1155-1178. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.421
  • Hausknecht, J.P., Day, D.V., & Thomas, S.C. (2004). Applicant reactions to selection procedures: An updated model and meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 57(3), 639-683. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2004.00003.x
  • Herring, C. (2009). Does diversity pay: Race, gender, and the business case for diversity. American Sociological Review, 74(2), 208-224. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240907400203
  • Highhouse, S. (2008). Stubborn Reliance on Intuition and Subjectivity in Employee Selection. Industrial and Organisational Psychology, 1(3), 333-342. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-9434.2008.00058.x
  • Huffcutt, A.I., & Arthur, W. (1994). Hunter and Hunter (1984) revisited: Interview validity for entry-level jobs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(2), 184-190. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.79.2.184
  • Kehoe, R.R., & Wright, P.M. (2013). The impact of high-performance human resource practices on employees’ attitudes and behaviours. Journal of Management, 39(2), 366-391. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310365901
  • Kristof-Brown, A.L., Zimmerman, R.D., & Johnson, E.C. (2005). Consequences of individuals' fit at work: A meta-analysis of person-job, person-organisation, person-group, and person-supervisor fit. Personnel Psychology, 58(2), 281-342. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00672.x
  • Kuncel, N.R., Hezlett, S.A., & Ones, D.S. (2004). Academic performance, career potential, creativity, and job performance: Can one construct predict them all? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(1), 148-161. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.86.1.148
  • Kuncel, N.R., Klieger, D.M., Connelly, B.S., & Ones, D.S. (2013). Mechanical versus clinical data combination in selection and admissions decisions: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(6), 1060-1072. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034156
  • Lee, S.M., Hwang, T., & Choi, D. (2012). Open innovation in the public sector of leading countries. Management Decision, 50(1), 147-162. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741211194921
  • Levashina, J., Hartwell, C.J., Morgeson, F.P., & Campion, M.A. (2014). The structured employment interview: Narrative and quantitative review of the research literature. Personnel Psychology, 67(1), 241-293. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12052
  • Levenson, A.R., Van der Stede, Wim A., & Cohen, S.G. (2006). Measuring the relationship between managerial competencies and performance. Journal of Management, 32(3), 360-380. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206305280789
  • Lievens, F., & Patterson, F. (2011). The validity and incremental validity of knowledge tests, low-fidelity simulations, and high-fidelity simulations for predicting job performance in advanced-level high-stakes selection. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(5), 927-940. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023496
  • Lievens, F., & Sackett, P.R. (2012). The validity of interpersonal skills assessment via situational judgment tests for predicting academic success and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(2), 460-468. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025741
  • Martín-Rojas, R., García-Morales, V.J., & Bolívar-Ramos, M.T. (2013). Influence of technological support, skills and competencies, and learning on corporate entrepreneurship in European technology firms. Technovation, 33(12), 417-430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2013.08.002
  • McCrae, R.R., & Costa, P.T. (1987). Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(1), 81-90. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.1.81
  • McDaniel, M.A., Hartman, N.S., Whetzel, D.L., & Grubb, W.L. (2007). Situational judgment tests, response instructions, and validity: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 60(1), 63-91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2007.00065.x
  • Miron-Spektor, E., Ingram, A., Keller, J., Smith, W.K., & Lewis, M.W. (2018). Microfoundations of organisational paradox: The problem is how we think about the problem. Academy of Management Journal, 61(1), 26-45. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.0594
  • Nishii, L.H. (2013). The benefits of climate for inclusion for gender-diverse groups. Academy of Management Journal, 56(6), 1754-1774. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.0823
  • Oh, I., Wang, G., & Mount, M.K. (2011). Validity of observer ratings of the five-factor model of personality traits: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(4), 762-773. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021832
  • Paunova, M. (2015). The emergence of individual and collective leadership in task groups: A matter of achievement and ascription. The Leadership Quarterly, 26(6), 935-957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.10.002
  • Ployhart, R.E., & Holtz, B. C. (2008). The diversity-validity dilemma: Strategies for reducing racioethnic and sex subgroup differences and adverse impact in selection. Personnel Psychology, 61(1), 153-172. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2008.00109.x
  • Ployhart, R.E., Holtz, B.C., & Bliese, P.D. (2002). Longitudinal data analysis: Applications of random coefficient modelling to leadership research. The Leadership Quarterly, 13(4), 455-486. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(02)00122-4
  • Presbitero, A., Roxas, B., & Chadee, D. (2016). Looking beyond HRM practices in enhancing employee retention in BPOs: Focus on employee-organisation value fit. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 27(6), 635-652. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2015.1035306
  • Riach, P.A., & Rich, J. (2002). Field experiments of discrimination in the marketplace. The Economic Journal, 112(483), F480-F518. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0297.00080
  • Rivera, L.A. (2012). Hiring as cultural matching: The case of elite professional service firms. American Sociological Review, 77(6), 999-1022. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122412463213
  • Roberson, Q.M. (2006). Disentangling the meanings of diversity and inclusion in organisations. Group and Organisation Management, 31(2), 212-236. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601104273064
  • Roth, P.L., Bobko, P., & McFarland, L.A. (2005). a meta-analysis of work sample test validity: Updating and integrating some classic literature. Personnel Psychology, 58(4), 1009-1037. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00714.x
  • Ryan, A.M., & Ployhart, R.E. (2000). Applicants’ perceptions of selection procedures and decisions: A critical review and agenda for the future. Journal of Management, 26(3), 565-606. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630002600308
  • Salgado, J.F., Anderson, N., Moscoso, S., Bertua, C., de Fruyt, F., & Rolland, J.P. (2003). A meta-analytic study of general mental ability validity for different occupations in the European community. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(6), 1068-1081. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.6.1068
  • Schmitt, N., & Chan, D. (1998). General theories of human characteristics and KSAO-Performance Relationships. In Personnel Selection: A Theoretical Approach (pp. 98-140). Sage.
  • Schmidt, F.L., & Hunter, J.E. (1998). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 124(2), 262-274. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.124.2.262
  • Silzer, R., & Church, A.H. (2009). The pearls and perils of identifying potential. Industrial and Organisational Psychology, 2(4), 377-412. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-9434.2009.01163.x
  • Spencer, L.M., & Spencer, S.M. (1993). The concept of competence. In Competence at work: Models for Superior Performance (pp. 1-15). Wiley.
  • Tidd, J., & Bessant, J.R. (2020). Innovation as a core business process. In Managing innovation: Integrating Technological, Market and Organisational Change (7th ed., pp. 70-114). Wiley.
  • Turner, N., & Lee-Kelley, L. (2013). Unpacking the theory on ambidexterity: An illustrative case on the managerial architectures, mechanisms and dynamics. Management Learning, 44(2), 179-196. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507612444074
  • Van Vugt, M., Hogan, R., & Kaiser, R.B. (2008). Leadership, followership, and evolution: Some lessons from the past. The American Psychologist, 63(3), 182-196. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.63.3.182
  • Whetzel, D.L., & McDaniel, M.A. (2009). Situational judgment tests: An overview of current research. Human Resource Management Review, 19(3), 188-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2009.03.007
MSc Human Resource Management
Deepen your understanding of Human Resource Management and its role in the organisational psychology of modern workplaces.
University of London
Share this post